π Next Meeting: 2026-04-14 12:00 AM
π§Ύ Bills Pending: 47
π View Agenda
π₯
Gregory Miller
(R)
π₯
W. Jay Luneau
(D)
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π 2026-04-14 at 12:00 AM
Author: Thomas Pressly
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π 2026-04-14 at 12:00 AM
Author: John Morris
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π 2026-04-14 at 12:00 AM
Author: Thomas Pressly
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π 2026-04-14 at 12:00 AM
Author: Gregory Miller
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π 2026-04-14 at 12:00 AM
Author: Rick Edmonds
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-30
Pending: π Judiciary A π 2026-04-14 at 12:00 AM
Author: Franklin Foil
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π 2026-04-14 at 12:00 AM
Author: Thomas Pressly
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: John Morris
1
1
This provision imposes a significantly heightened standard for recovering damages for mental anguish, requiring severe, debilitating harm, medical evidence, and proof of outrageous conduct and a special duty. Such layered requirements risk denying recovery in legitimate cases where real harm exists but cannot meet these rigid thresholds.
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Alan Seabaugh
1
This measure conditions the issuance of service on the prepayment of fees, effectively tying access to the courts to a partyβs ability to pay within a strict timeframe. Such a requirement risks dismissal of otherwise valid claims based on financial or administrative hurdles rather than the merits.
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Robert Allain
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Gregory Miller
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Gregory Miller
1
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Blake Miguez
1
This measure authorizes the state to expropriate property based solely on the identity or nationality of the owner, rather than any unlawful use of the property. Such an approach raises serious concerns regarding due process, equal protection, and the fundamental principle that property rights should not depend on who owns the property.
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Jimmy Harris
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Heather Cloud
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Beth Mizell
1
1
This proposal imposes arbitrary caps on general damages that applyregardless of the number of parties responsible, meaning multiple wrongdoers are collectively shielded by a single limit. It restricts the ability of courts and juries to fully account for the scope of harm and shared liability in complex cases. Justice should reflect the actual damages and responsibility involvedβnot be constrained by inflexible, one-size-fits-all caps.
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Katrina Jackson-Andrews
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Larry Selders
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-18
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: John Wyble
1
GENERAL OBJECTION TO THE CREATION OF ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE CARVE-OUTS
Our legislature should take a more practical and principled approach by adopting laws of general applicability rather than creating narrow statutory carve-outs tailored to individual jurisdictions. If a policy is appropriate for one municipality, parish or body, it should be made available statewide, allowing local governing authorities to determine whether and how it should be implemented within their communities. The continued proliferation of location-specific exceptions undermines consistency in the law and encourages piecemeal legislation rather than sound statewide policy.
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-18
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Laurie Schlegel
1
1
This provision is overly broad, applying to virtually any software that provides an interactive or personalized experienceβwhich includes most modern applications and websites. By imposing a generalized duty of care without clear limits or definitions, it creates uncertainty and exposes a wide range of ordinary businesses to potential liability far beyond the billβs apparent intent.
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-18
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Laurie Schlegel
Co-sponsors: Kathy Edmonston Mike Johnson Ed Larvadain Daryl Adams Beryl Amedee Tony Bacala Dennis Bamburg Stephanie Berault Beth Billings Doyle Boudreaux Delisha Boyd Chad Boyer Reese Broussard Marcus Bryant Rhonda Butler Josh Carlson Kim Carver Tehmi Chassion Emily Chenevert Kimberly Coates Vincent Cox Phillip DeVillier Daryl Deshotel Jason DeWitt Kellee Dickerson Peter Egan Bryan Fontenot Aimee Freeman Barbara Freiberg Brian Glorioso Stephanie Hilferty Dodie Horton John Illg Timothy Kerner Alonzo Knox Vanessa Caston Lafleur Terry Landry Jr. Rodney Lyons Shane Mack Denise Marcelle Chasity Martinez Pat Moore Ed Murray Candace Newell Charles Owen Annie Spell Joseph Stagni Phillip Tarver Sylvia Taylor Francis Thompson Debbie Villio Joy Walters Roger Wilder Jeff Wiley John Wyble Jerome Zeringue
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-23
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Mike Bayham
Co-sponsors: Daryl Adams Beryl Amedee Lawrence Bagley Beth Billings Tehmi Chassion Raymond Crews Adrian Fisher Kyle Green Steven Jackson Terry Landry Jr. Ed Larvadain Shaun Mena Dustin Miller Ed Murray Candace Newell Annie Spell Sylvia Taylor Joy Walters
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Chance Henry
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Vincent St. Blanc
1
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Mike Bayham
1
GENERAL OBJECTION TO THE CREATION OF ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE CARVE-OUTS
Our legislature should take a more practical and principled approach by adopting laws of general applicability rather than creating narrow statutory carve-outs tailored to individual jurisdictions. If a policy is appropriate for one municipality, parish or body, it should be made available statewide, allowing local governing authorities to determine whether and how it should be implemented within their communities. The continued proliferation of location-specific exceptions undermines consistency in the law and encourages piecemeal legislation rather than sound statewide policy.
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Nicholas Muscarello
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Mandie Landry
Co-sponsors: Sylvia Taylor
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Troy Hebert
1
GENERAL OBJECTION TO THE CREATION OF ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE CARVE-OUTS
Our legislature should take a more practical and principled approach by adopting laws of general applicability rather than creating narrow statutory carve-outs tailored to individual jurisdictions. If a policy is appropriate for one municipality, parish or body, it should be made available statewide, allowing local governing authorities to determine whether and how it should be implemented within their communities. The continued proliferation of location-specific exceptions undermines consistency in the law and encourages piecemeal legislation rather than sound statewide policy.
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Robert Carter
Co-sponsors: Sylvia Taylor
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Robert Carter
Co-sponsors: Sylvia Taylor
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Mandie Landry
Co-sponsors: Mike Bayham Beth Billings Ryan Bourriaque Delisha Boyd Marcus Bryant Kyle Green Dana Henry Timothy Kerner Vanessa Caston Lafleur Terry Landry Jr. Ed Larvadain Rodney Lyons Wayne McMahen Pat Moore Ed Murray Candace Newell Laurie Schlegel Sylvia Taylor Christopher Turner Joy Walters
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Delisha Boyd
Co-sponsors: Sylvia Taylor
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Vanessa Caston Lafleur
1
GENERAL OBJECTION TO THE CREATION OF ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE CARVE-OUTS
Our legislature should take a more practical and principled approach by adopting laws of general applicability rather than creating narrow statutory carve-outs tailored to individual jurisdictions. If a policy is appropriate for one municipality, parish or body, it should be made available statewide, allowing local governing authorities to determine whether and how it should be implemented within their communities. The continued proliferation of location-specific exceptions undermines consistency in the law and encourages piecemeal legislation rather than sound statewide policy.
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Jeremy LaCombe
Co-sponsors: Emily Chenevert Kellee Dickerson Jay Galle Troy Hebert Edmond Jordan Vanessa Caston Lafleur Mandie Landry Shane Mack Candace Newell Joseph Orgeron Charles Owen Lauren Ventrella Jeff Wiley Jerome Zeringue
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Mike Bayham
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Emily Chenevert
Co-sponsors: Daryl Adams Mike Bayham Stephanie Berault Beth Billings Chad Boyer Rhonda Butler Kim Carver Kellee Dickerson Kathy Edmonston Peter Egan Adrian Fisher Dodie Horton Jeremy LaCombe Vanessa Caston Lafleur Jack McFarland Charles Owen John Wyble Beryl Amedee
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Alan Seabaugh
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Abraham
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Alan Seabaugh
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Patrick Connick
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Alan Seabaugh
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: W. Jay Luneau
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-08
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Laurie Schlegel
Co-sponsors: Kathy Edmonston
1
1
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-08
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Raymond Crews
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-08
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Neil Riser
Co-sponsors: Stewart Cathey
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-08
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Ryan Bourriaque
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-04-08
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Nicholas Muscarello
π Details π View Bill on Legislature Website