Last Action: Scheduled for floor debate on 04/13/2026.
Date: 2026-04-09
Floor Action: π Awaiting Floor Action π 2026-04-13
Author: Ryan Bourriaque
1
Last Action: Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
Date: 2026-04-08
Floor Action: π Awaiting Floor Action
Author: Charles Owen
1
Last Action: Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
Date: 2026-04-08
Floor Action: π Awaiting Floor Action
Author: Gabe Firment
1
Last Action: Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
Date: 2026-04-08
Floor Action: π Awaiting Floor Action
Author: Kyle Green
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Civil Law and Procedure π Not Scheduled
Author: Chad Boyer
1
1
Sets cap for "GENERAL DAMAGES" for EACH plaintiff/claimant at $5 million.
Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Labor & Industrial Relations π Not Scheduled
Author: Michael Melerine
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Civil Law and Procedure π Not Scheduled
Author: Emily Chenevert
1
1
1
Last Action: Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 98, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
Date: 2026-04-09
Author: Travis Johnson
Co-sponsors: Beryl Amedee Reese Broussard Josh Carlson Barbara Carpenter Kim Carver Kathy Edmonston Barbara Freiberg Chasity Martinez Vincent St. Blanc Sylvia Taylor
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Civil Law and Procedure π Not Scheduled
Author: Michael Melerine
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Labor and Industrial Relations π Not Scheduled
Author: Emily Chenevert
1
1
This bill raises the burden on injured workers to file claims while expanding employersβ ability to initiate disputes against them.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Civil Law and Procedure π Not Scheduled
Author: Kellee Dickerson
1
1
This proposal imposes arbitrary caps on general damages that applyregardless of the number of parties responsible, meaning multiple wrongdoers are collectively shielded by a single limit. It restricts the ability of courts and juries to fully account for the scope of harm and shared liability in complex cases. Justice should reflect the actual damages and responsibility involvedβnot be constrained by inflexible, one-size-fits-all caps.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Ways and Means π Not Scheduled
Author: Josh Carlson
1
1
1
Centralizing all sales tax collection creates a single point of control/power and potential failure, while distancing local governments from the administration of their own revenue. Even with remittance requirements, this structure risks delays, inefficiencies, and reduced accountability to local taxpayers.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Ways and Means π Not Scheduled
Author: Josh Carlson
1
1
Centralizing all sales tax collection creates a single point of control/power and potential failure, while distancing local governments from the administration of their own revenue. Even with remittance requirements, this structure risks delays, inefficiencies, and reduced accountability to local taxpayers.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on House and Governmental Affairs.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π House and Governmental Affairs π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Wright
1
1
1
While reducing unnecessary regulations is a worthwhile goal, mandating that two rules be repealed for every new rule is arbitrary and inflexible. If consolidation or repeal is appropriate, it can be addressed within the rulemaking process itself without imposing a rigid quota. If this model is truly sound policy, it raises the question of why similar constraints are not applied to legislative enactments.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Labor and Industrial Relations π Not Scheduled
Author: Raymond Crews
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Civil Law and Procedure π Not Scheduled
Author: Tony Bacala
1
Last Action: Reported with amendments (10-0). Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
Date: 2026-04-09
Author: Alan Seabaugh
1
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Gregory Miller
1
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: Beth Mizell
1
1
This proposal imposes arbitrary caps on general damages that applyregardless of the number of parties responsible, meaning multiple wrongdoers are collectively shielded by a single limit. It restricts the ability of courts and juries to fully account for the scope of harm and shared liability in complex cases. Justice should reflect the actual damages and responsibility involvedβnot be constrained by inflexible, one-size-fits-all caps.
Last Action: Reported favorably (10-0). Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
Date: 2026-04-09
Author: Alan Seabaugh
1
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary A π Not Scheduled
Author: John Morris
1
1
This provision imposes a significantly heightened standard for recovering damages for mental anguish, requiring severe, debilitating harm, medical evidence, and proof of outrageous conduct and a special duty. Such layered requirements risk denying recovery in legitimate cases where real harm exists but cannot meet these rigid thresholds.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Insurance.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Insurance π Not Scheduled
Author: Kyle Green
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Administration of Criminal Justice π Not Scheduled
Author: Lauren Ventrella
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Civil Law and Procedure π Not Scheduled
Author: Wilford Carter
Co-sponsors: Ed Larvadain
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Civil Law and Procedure π Not Scheduled
Author: Lauren Ventrella
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Insurance.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Insurance π Not Scheduled
Author: Edmond Jordan
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Insurance.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Insurance π Not Scheduled
Author: Edmond Jordan
1
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary C.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary C π Not Scheduled
Author: W. Jay Luneau
1
Last Action: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Labor & Industrial Relations π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Abraham
1