(1476 House floor votes analyzed β so far...)
π 2026-04-13 at 09:30
π Scheduled: 13
π Bills Pending: 91
π 2026-04-14 at 09:00
π Scheduled: 9
π Bills Pending: 88
Last Action: Scheduled for floor debate on 04/15/2026.
Date: 2026-04-07
Floor Action: π Awaiting Floor Action π 2026-04-15
Author: Mark Wright
Co-sponsors: Patrick McMath
Last Action: Scheduled for floor debate on 04/14/2026.
Date: 2026-04-09
Floor Action: π Awaiting Floor Action π 2026-04-14
Author: Mark Wright
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Commerce π 2026-04-13 at 9:00 AM
Author: Mark Wright
1
This proposal promotes uniformity by eliminating a special exception and ensuring that all municipalities are subject to the same regulatory framework. No single city should receive preferential treatment when it comes to utility regulation. A consistent, statewide approach strengthens fairness, accountability, and equal application of the law.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on House and Governmental Affairs.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π House and Governmental Affairs π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Wright
1
1
1
While reducing unnecessary regulations is a worthwhile goal, mandating that two rules be repealed for every new rule is arbitrary and inflexible. If consolidation or repeal is appropriate, it can be addressed within the rulemaking process itself without imposing a rigid quota. If this model is truly sound policy, it raises the question of why similar constraints are not applied to legislative enactments.
Last Action: Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, recommitted to the Committee on Appropriations.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Appropriations π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Wright
1
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Transportation, Highways and Public Works.
Date: 2026-03-31
Pending: π Transportation, Highways and Public Works π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Wright
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Transportation, Highways and Public Works.
Date: 2026-04-01
Pending: π Transportation, Highways and Public Works π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Wright
π Details π View Bill on Legislature WebsiteLast Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Appropriations π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Wright
1
The premise of this proposal is flawedβif government has excess funds to invest, it has taken more from taxpayers than it needs. Instead of seeking new ways to deploy surplus revenue, the focus should be on reducing the tax burden.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Appropriations π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Wright
1
Ref. HB603 / The premise of this proposal is flawedβif government has excess funds to invest, it has taken more from taxpayers than it needs. Instead of seeking new ways to deploy surplus revenue, the focus should be on reducing the tax burden.
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Date: 2026-03-09
Pending: π Judiciary π Not Scheduled
Author: Mark Wright
Last Action: Read by title. Lies over under the rules.
Date: 2026-04-09
Floor Action: π Awaiting Floor Action
Author: Mark Wright
π Details π View Bill on Legislature Website